| 
               
             | 
              | 
            
               
                  
                     | 
                        
                        			
                        		
                           
                        Dobro dosli na BILINGVALNI web site  
                           Nekomercijalne, strukovne,  
                           profesionalno-edukativne organizacije 
                           Humano urbane mreze:" PSYTRACE" Psihosocijalno terapeutsko savetovaliste 
                           Beograd - kontakt osoba:Office manager Dragan 
                           Phone :+381 64 140 37 53 
                             
                           
                           Istrazivacke delatnosti organizacije  :  
                           Socijalna antropologija , 
                           Socijalna psihologija, 
                           Sociologija kulture i maskulture , 
                           Subkulture i pop-kultura 
                           Komunikologija i masmediji 
                           Socijalna psihopatologija 
                             
                             Psihosocijalno savetovaliste PSYTRACE radi
                           savetodavno i terapeutski sa ljudima na individualnom i porodicnom nivou. 
                           Strucni tim radi i na izradi , 
                           apliciranju i sprovodjenju projekata  
                           sociopsiholoskog,  
                           edukativnog i zdravstvenog sadrzaja. 
                             
                           Konsalting za organizacije, timove NVO,NPO i pojedinca(sa
                           preporukom supervizora / profesionalca ) u oblasti - 
                           
                           - 
                           
-- Poboljsanje kvaliteta zivota { wellbeing }  
                           - 
                           
-- Interpersonalna komunikacija unutar grupe / tima  
                           - 
                           
-Umece sirenja znanja i iskustva unutar sistema  
                           - 
                           
    -- DISIPACIJA informacija unutar delova sistema 
                               
                         
                        
                           Novi /Stari pristup u oblasti Mentalnog zdravlja 
                             
                           Deinsistucionalizacija za nas već više godina predstavlja modifikaciju paradigme lečenja I isceljenja
                           odnosno modifikacija naučnosti psihijatrije, neuropsihijatrije kroz institucije.  
                             
                           Svi neuspesi jednog određenog tipa deinstitucionalizacije koji su bivali sprovođeni delimično ili u
                           pokušaju i/ili su bili na dobrom putu ka realizaciji  , zasnivali su se na
                           činjenici da su se na određeni način preoblikovale organizacije službi za mentalno zdravlje, ali da se
                           nije zaista promenila kultura psihijatrije kao nauke , kao ni sam epistemološki model psihijatrijskog sagledavanja čoveka
                           .  
                             
                           Racionalitička paradigma : problem – rešenje u psihijatriji ne funkcioniše. Složenost psihijatrijskog
                           objekta nije moguće razrešiti uzročno-posledičnom analizom. Jedna kauzalna anliza ne može biti od
                           prevelike koristi .  
                           To mora biti  analiza mogućnosti I verovatnođe .  
                             
                           Human Urban Net zagovara emancipaciju : radnika službi i korisnika službi . Emancipacija se kreće između
                           deinstitucionalizacije u kome se danas kreće terapeutski rad , a u kome se izgrađuju nove pozicije I nove perspektive
                           . Mi smatramo da  lečiti  znači
                           angažovati se sada I ovde za preobražavanje načina života kako bi se mogla čuti I problematizovati
                           patnja čoveka. Lečenje u novom ruhu znači kontinuitet rada na sebi I kretanje prema sopstevnoj autonomiji.
                           Znači I preuzimanje sopstevne odluke I života samog , zajedno sa podrazumevajućim nesigurnostima.  
                             
                           Mi stojimo na tragu potpuno drugačije deinstitucionalizacije . Potrebna je možda I hrabrost  sagledati da neke institucije ljude I dalje  seckaju na komade,
                           uz svo propratno mumificiranje životnosti , totalizaciju ličnosti .  
                           Danas, stvari se kreću dobrim tokom u nameri 
                           . Ne možemo ne priznati , ne videti da Ministarstvo
                           Zdravlja učinilo  značajne
                           pomake .  
                             
                           Ipak podsećamo na važne reči , izrečene još 1986. u Sevilji, a deo su izlaganja Profesora  Galimbertija :  
                           Lekarski pregled ne predstavlja susret sa bolesnikom već sa njegovom bolešću , a njegovom telu ne čita
                           se biologija već patologija. Tim činom subjektivitet pacijenta nestaje
                           u objektivitetu simptomatskih znakova.  
                           Stari medicinski model još tada je stavljen pod sumnju . Danas, on je oslobođen omnipotentnosti , obogaćen
                           je , izmenjenog lica, preimenovan, destigmatizovan .  
                             
                             Mentalno zdravlje nije više samo deo lanca koji uključuje simptome
                           i/ili dijagnoze, već se usredsređuje na emancipaciju , na izumljivanje zdravlja  po
                           Galimbertiju . Ne postoji više jedno zdravlja već puno nivoa pristupa zdravlju od preventivnog do nivoa olaksanja
                           bitisanja kod terminalnih ili nekih neizlecivih bolesti  .  
                             
                           Human Urban Net ,  
                           
                           PsyTrace       
                           
                         
                        .
                            
                         
                        
                           Human Urban Net issue and field of researching  
                           What is SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY
                           The social sciences are dedicated
                           to understanding the human condition, ideally to the extent that the singular and collective behaviors of human beings can
                           be understood and even predicted. Though their goals are identical in the abstract, these "sciences" differ in terms of their
                           way of looking at things, the questions they ask, the methods they use in addressing these questions, and what they do with
                           this information once they obtain it.  
                           Amid this multitude of social science disciplines is social psychology, which, as can be inferred from its label,
                           involves the ways in which both social and mental processes determine action. What, precisely, this means research-wise, however,
                           remains a matter of historic debate both between and within the disciplines of psychology and sociology. What weight is to
                           be given to the social, the psychological, and the interaction between the two? What does the interaction between psychological
                           and sociological processes even mean?  
                           In approaching the problem
                           of why some people do certain things, psychologists (see Wesleyan's Social Psychology Network) are inclined to give greater attention to the bearing of thought processes, personality characteristics, and their changes
                           across the life cycle. The closed, stereotypic thinking of authoritarians, for instance, make them more likely to be prejudiced
                           and to join extreme right-wing political groups.  
                           Sociologists, on the other
                           hand, being more interested in understanding the relationships between group structures and processes (typologizing groups
                           much like psychologists classify selves as the first step toward predicting their activities) are inclined to give greater
                           attention to the social settings and individuals' roles there within.  
                           As opposed to psychology's atomization of the human condition, focusing on the self and its inner workings, sociologists'
                           attention is directed toward human connections. Connectedness with others is an overarching personal drive, and the bonds
                           produced comprise the social fabric of interrelationships. The strength of this social fabric is determined by the multiplicity
                           and quality of connections individuals and groups (both large and small) have with each other. Further, from this sociological
                           perspective of the human condition, these groups have dynamics of their own (often distinct from members' intentions and desires)
                           that cannot be reduced down to the psychology of individuals. Like differing board games, these social orders have their own
                           rules, roles, and styles of play, traditions, cultures, and rates of change over time. Change the "game" and you change the style of thinking,
                           the language, motivations, activities, alliances, and identities of the players. 
                           It is for these reasons that sociologically inclined social psychologists are more likely to examine how individuals'
                           perceptions, belief systems, moralities, identities, and behaviors are determined by their positions in social space:  
                           
                           - The culture of their primary socializations; 
 
                           - The slice of social history intersecting their biographies, such as coming of age
                           during a time of depression or war; 
 
                           - their locations within the stratification orders of gender, age, race, and social
                           class; 
 
                           - their roles within the institutional orders of religion, work, community, and family;
                           
 
                           - the geographic context of their childhoods, such as region of the country or the
                           size of cities wherein they lived; 
 
                           - and their memberships in and relative identifications with various social groups.
                           
 
                           - Psych-Net UK, and the online resources from the Social Science Information Gateway. 
                           
   
                         
                        
                      | 
                   
                  
                       | 
                   
                  
                     
                        
                           
                              
                                 
                                    
                                       
                                          
                                          			
                                          			
                                          		
                                          
                                             Psychotherapy is also itself a discourse?
                                             Psychotherapy is also itself a discourse, a set of ideas which constructs itsown truth and has even become part
                                             of common sense within everyday interaction, esspecially within the medium of women's magazines.This is apparent in the language
                                             and visual representations as well as in the ambiguilities of the SHE COVER images. Its concepts and processes, has been employed
                                             in the creation of the "figure"of independent mother, especially the notions of narcissism and miror phase in the construction
                                             of Indentity, 
                                             its universal category. Does this
                                             constitute a new identity ? Ironically two decades before Lacan elaborated the notion of Fpallus is the late 1950s. He
                                             was already aware of the historically specific nature of the patriarchal family and the role it played as image or model in
                                             generating the Freud's classic Oedipal formation. 
                                               
                                             Such challenges emphasize the importance
                                             of the pre-Oedipal stage, before entry into the patriarchal symbolic language and the  
                                             "law of the father" although feminist
                                             critiques take very different position on this question . Theorists agreed on the pre-Oedipal stage , as a lost continent
                                             to which we all, women and men , seek to return. 
                                             Just now everybody wants to talk
                                             about 'identity' ...identity becomes an issue when it is in crisis, when something assumed to be fixed, coherent
                                             and stable is displaced by the experience of doubt and uncertainty. 
                                             'Identity' and 'identity
                                             crisis' are words and ideas much in current use and there are seen by some sociologists and theorists as characterizing
                                             contemporary or late-modern societies.  
                                               
                                              My ethernal dilemmas  
                                             E.B. 
                                               
                                           
                                            
                                          LIVING IN A CATEGORICAL(SIMBOLIC) WORLD 
                                             Knowledge is the small part of ignorance that
                                             we arrange and classify In The Fine Line, Eviatar Zerubavel develops how language allows us to detach mental
                                             entities from their surroundings and to assign them fixed, decontextualized meanings. Such detachments, the deriving of
                                             categories of things, involves making discreteness out of continuums.  
                                             The cultural variations in the process are
                                             impressive: "while there is a single word for both rats and mice in Latin, insects and airplanes in Hopi, and brothers-in-law
                                             and grandnephews in the Algonquian language of the Fox, there are separate words or blankets that are folded and spread out,
                                             for water in buckets and in lakes, and for dogs that stand and sit in Navajo" Among the consequences of such semantic parsings
                                             of the world are seeing greater similarities among elements within a category of things than may, in fact, be the case, and
                                             seeing greater differences between elements within different categories. Further, "we often commit the fallacy of misplaced
                                             concreteness and regard such purely mental constructs as if they were actually real" (p. 79). In sum, as C. Wright Mills
                                             observed, "By acquiring the categories of a language we acquire the structured `ways' of a group, and along with the language,
                                             the value-implicates of those `ways'" (p. 433 of "Language, Logic and Culture" in Power, Politics and People).  
                                               
                                             LANGUAGE AS SHIBBOLETH, POWER AND DECEPTION 
                                             One lesson of "My Fair Lady" (which was from
                                             George Bernard Shaw's "Pygmalion") is how language functions as a code of membership. Different social groups emerge with
                                             different languages, which allow members to distinguish who is in their group and who is not. To distinguish themselves from
                                             "lesser others," English aristocrats spoke Norman French into the 15th century just as early 20th century educated Russians
                                             and Poles spoke French. Working class speech, according to the research of Basil Bernstein, Leonard Schatzman, and Anselm
                                             Strauss, is marked by its immediacy (most verbs are present tense: "What's happening?"), empathy and stress on collective
                                             emotion. Mountain climbers "sew up the route" instead of "cratering" or having a "screamer" like novices. The status of in-
                                             group members are linguistically reaffirmed while members of out-groups are often belittled, as when skiers refer to snowboards
                                             as "knuckle draggers." 
                                             Power comes to those who know the language
                                             of a particular group, and those "not in the know" often must defer to those who speak computerese, bureaucratize, or legalese.
                                             For an interesting read check out William Lutz's Doublespeak: From "Revenue Enhancement" to "Terminal Living" How Government,
                                             Business, Advertisers, and Others Use Language to Deceive You. He quotes GM's Thomas Murphy, who claims that business
                                             is bad because "We are in a period of negative economic growth" (p.106); the military's reference to shooting its own men
                                             as the "accidental delivery of ordinance equipment" which creates "friendly casualties" (p.176). In the November 1990 issue
                                             of Executive Recruiter News, the following list of euphemisms for "you're fired" was proffered: outplacement, downsizing,
                                             right-sizing, force reduction, infinite idling, redundancy elimination, involuntary separation, skill-mix adjustment, and
                                             fumigation. Feel better?  
                                               
                                             THE POWER OF LABELS 
                                             In 1952, when the first APA Diagnostic and
                                             Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM) appeared, there were 106 forms of psychiatric abnormalities listed. Forty-two
                                             years later, over 300 were listed, from "Major Depression" and "Schizophrenia" to such designations "Hypoactive Sexual Desire
                                             Disorder," "Disorder of Written Expression" (which involves poor grammar and bad spelling and handwriting), and "lexical anhedonia"
                                             (the inability to feel pleasure while reading). What are the implications of so labeling people?  
                                             Labels have a tendency to become self-fulling
                                             prophecies.  
                                             People tend to conform to the labels others
                                             apply to them, which is referred to as the Pygmalion Effect. In writing of the works of Michel Foucault and Ian Hacking, Mary Douglas writes in How Institutions Think:  
                                             As fast as new medical categories (hitherto
                                             unimagined) were invented, or new criminal or sexual or moral categories, new kinds of people spontaneously came forward in
                                             hordes to accept the labels and to live accordingly. The responsiveness to new labels suggests extraordinary readiness to
                                             fall into new slots and to let selfhood be defined. ...[P]eople are not merely re-labeled and newly made prominent, still
                                             behaving as they would behave whether so labeled or not. The new people behave differently than they ever did before (p.100).
                                              
                                               
                                             
                                             What if people had tails and, like dogs, can
                                             not help but wag them when excited or have them point straight down when shamed? Think about how social life would be changed.
                                             Who knows, perhaps the game of poker would become obsolete. Business dealings may well require that top executives and sales
                                             staff have their tails clipped lest they let on to customers and rivals what they really think. There are social scientists
                                             who believe that individuals do, despite their best attempts, emit such uncontrollable expressions of their true feelings
                                             and motivations. Paul Ekman, for example, has identified certain involuntary movements of facial muscles that accompany lying behavior, such as body
                                             movements and facial expressions being out of sync, asymmetrical facial expressions, and declining use of gestures. Prolonged
                                             smiles are usually false as authentic facial expressions generally fade within five seconds.  
                                             Despite our garrulousness, experts have estimated
                                             that perhaps as little as 20% of our communication occurs through verbal channels. Bill Bryson notes in The Mother Tongue:
                                             English & How It Got That Way (William Morrow, 1990:36-7):  
                                             A vital adjunct to language is the gesture,
                                             which in some cultures can almost constitute a vocabulary all its own. Modern Greek has more than seventy common gestures,
                                             ranging from the chopping off the forearm gesture, which signifies extreme displeasure, to several highly elaborate ones,
                                             such as placing the left hand on the knee, closing one eye, looking up with the other into the middle distance and wagging
                                             the free hand up and down, which means "I don't want anything to do with it." According to Mario Pei, the human anatomy is
                                             capable of producing some 700,000 "distinct elementary gestures" of this type. 
                                             [Delovi txt-a “LIVING IN A SYMBOLIC WORLD” preuzeti
                                             sa:  “Social Psychology Index” ciji smo regularni clanovi ] 
                                              
                                           
                                          
                                        | 
                                     
                                    
                                         | 
                                     
                                    
                                       | 
                                          
                                          			
                                           Mission Statement 
                                          			
                                          To ensure people get the right idea, we'll include a brief statement here that describes our organization. We'll tell people
                                             what we want to accomplish and exactly how we plan to do it.
                                           
                                          		
                                          
                                        | 
                                     
                                  
                               | 
                                | 
                              
                                 
                               | 
                            
                         
                      | 
                   
                  
                     | 
                        
                      | 
                   
                
             | 
              |